Monthly Portfolio Update and Year in Review – December 2018

IMG_20181227_114716_585
He who has begun has half done.
Horace Epistles (Book I.ii)

Year in review

This year began with resetting my objectives to reach a portfolio value of $1 476 000 by the end of the year, to support an annual passive income of around $58 000.

This goal has not been met, despite the overall portfolio coming within about $60 000 of the target in September. Just as expected at the start of 2018, it did indeed prove a more challenging environment for closing on this goal than the previous year.

In fact, instead of reaching the target as hoped, the portfolio actually finished the past year around 3 per cent below where it commenced at the start of 2018, despite significant investments regularly though the year.

12month2018progThe reasons for this are two-fold.

First, the fall in the price of Bitcoin from its highs early in 2018 has provided a steady, and sometimes sharp, headwind to the journey. Through the year the resulting loss of around $130 000 simply could not reasonably be made up for, even assuming good performance of all other assets. Bitcoin has reduced from 14% to just 4.5% of the portfolio, so perhaps the only positive to take from this grinding performance is that it will not have the ability to have this same kind of depressing effect on next years record. Nonetheless, I am happy enough to retain my current holdings. This is because I agree with sentiments from Nassim Taleb that it represents a unique form of insurance policy against very poor future outcomes.

Second, recent falls in equity markets have worsened the results. Given normal volatility in shares, however, this has not concerned me or reduced my intention to continue to invest in equities. What is perhaps more interesting than a negative single year performance of shares is that 2018 has been highly unusual in the high proportion of all asset classes experiencing negative returns.

Overall, the failure to meet my objective #1 is not particularly surprising or a source of dissatisfaction. It has been on the cards for the last few months, and I have had time to adjust. An additional factor has been that my nominal passive income target of $58 000 per year has been the same since July 2016, unadjusted for inflation, or median income movements. This has meant that I have known for some time that I would not be likely to feel comfortable with it as a defining triggering point of financial independence. Thus it has felt like missing a target that had more symbolic than practical or intrinsic meaning.

Finally, I’m sanguine about missing the target because I think that with the passage of time and ongoings savings, passing that particular value will be most likely be achieved, even if perhaps 6-18 months later than anticipated.

Rather, the achievements of this past year that stand out are:

  • Continued exploration: this has included switching from use of Vanguard retail funds to regular investments in low cost ETFs such as the Betashares A200, using a low cost broker, lowering management costs on new investments, and trying new Fintech providers such as Spaceship.
  • Following the course: having set an asset allocation plan, this has driven portfolio choices that inertia and absence of a plan would not have, such as a systematic reduction in my Ratesetter holdings, regular new investments in Australian equities during periods of volatility, and stopping allocation of any new funds to bonds.

A pleasing part of the past year has also been the growth in readership, which I am grateful to readers for. This has genuinely been a pleasant surprise, and has been somewhat accelerated by a kind profile of Australian FI bloggers in the April edition of Money Magazine.

20180429_173419

As I do each year at this time, I have been reviewing my investment policy and looking at possible new goals. I have also been stress-testing my plans, assumptions and asset allocations.

Before finalising these, as with last year, I want to understand the shape and level of fund and ETF distributions arising from the past six months. This means waiting until December distributions are finalised or announced. I am looking forward to sharing these updated plans – including possibly some new portfolio objectives – in the next couple of weeks or so.

Monthly Portfolio Update – December 2018

This is my twenty-fifth portfolio update. I complete this update monthly to check my progress against my goals which, as mentioned, are likely to be evolving soon.

Portfolio goals

For the moment, however, my objectives were to reach a portfolio of:

  • $1 476 000 by 31 December 2018. This would produce a real income of about $58 000 (Objective #1).
  • $2 041 000 by 31 July 2023, to produce a passive income equivalent to $80 000 in 2017 dollars (Objective #2)

Both of these were based on a real return of 3.92%, or a nominal return of 7.17%

Portfolio summary

  • Vanguard Lifestrategy High Growth Fund – $669 046
  • Vanguard Lifestrategy Growth Fund  – $39 448
  • Vanguard Lifestrategy Balanced Fund – $72 167
  • Vanguard Diversified Bonds Fund – $101 645
  • Vanguard Australia Shares ETF (VAS) – $71 070
  • Betashares Australia 200 ETF (A200) – $138 346
  • Telstra shares – $3 799
  • Insurance Australia Group shares – $12 208
  • NIB Holdings shares – $6 240
  • Gold ETF (GOLD.ASX)  – $82 863
  • Secured physical gold – $13 365
  • Ratesetter (P2P lending) – $30 131
  • Bitcoin – $59 570
  • Raiz app (Aggressive portfolio) – $ 12 584
  • Spaceship Voyager app (Index portfolio) – $1 430
  • BrickX (P2P rental real estate) – $4 851

Total value: $1 318 763  (-$13 869)

Asset allocation

  • Australian shares –  38%
  • International shares – 24%
  • Emerging markets shares – 3%
  • International small companies – 4%
  • Total shares – 68.9% (3.9% over)**
  • Australian property securities – 0.4%
  • Total property – 0.4% (4.1% under)
  • Australian bonds – 7%
  • International bonds – 12%
  • Total bonds – 18.8% (3.8% over)**
  • Cash – 1.3%
  • Gold – 7.3%
  • Bitcoin – 4.5%
  • Gold and alternatives – 11.8% (3.2% under)

Presented visually, below is a high-level view of how the asset allocation of the portfolio currently looks.

Dec18AssetAlloc

Comments

The portfolio has fallen short of the target, reflecting the factors discussed above. Over this month I have concentrated on continuing to make new investments though the significant equity market volatility, while undertaking some of the reflection and research required for the review of my investment policy and goals.

For the sharp-eyed a small but significant change in allocation seems to have occurred in the past month. This is because in the course of reviewing of my investment plans and working sheets I have had time to integrate some larger than initially expected changes made to the Vanguard Lifestrategy retail funds standard pre-set asset allocations.

The effect of this has been to lower my property security allocation to almost nothing, and mildly increase my share allocation. It has also shifted the balance between Australian and foreign equities. Rather fortuitously, this has moved in the direction I was actually intending to pursue, increasing my international equity exposure, which had previously stagnated as my Australian equity ETF index purchases occurred through this year.

The last few months have seen the largest ever declines in my overall portfolio, giving a sense of ‘treading water’ while making regular purchases into a falling, or at best sideways, market. Positively, this has seen purchases of A200 at the lowest prices I have paid so far. This adds some minor upside to the generally unhappy story of portfolio value over the year set out below.12monthchngport-Dec18

Progress

Progress to:

  • Objective #1: 89.3% or $157 237 further to reach goal.
  • Objective #2: 64.6% or $722 237 further to reach goal.

Summary

As summer heat has kept me inside, there has been ample time to take a long perspective on the journey so far, and the shifting priorities and themes of the year. What has become more apparent is the sense of building momentum, particularly in the passive income element of the portfolio.

Calculating the other day, I discovered that 2018 was, in paper value terms, the most difficult, loss-making part of my long journey so far. That it does not feel this way is testament to my increasing focus on and confidence from two other components of the journey – portfolio income, and its steadily growing capacity to meet regular life expenses.

The next few days, and specifically knowledge of distributions that are due to be calculated and paid, will prove important for my future sense of the speed of progress. It’s not impossible that distributions, like the portfolio value, could go backwards compared to the last few periods. The level of distributions will determine other important parts of my investment plan – such as required emergency fund levels, and insurance coverage levels.

So as 2019 begins, progress continues, and distributions and the new information they provide will flow into my next updated set of plans for financial independence.

** These variances have been recalculated from this month onwards to be in reference to my longer term allocation targets for equities and bonds (65/15), rather than a previous lower transitional target of 61-62 over the past two years.

6 comments

  1. As someone still new to investing I am yet to come to terms with market movements. It helps that I am starting small. I hope to have the same view of things as you do especially with the Bitcoin movements.

    Looking forward to the next update.

    1. Thanks for the read J.D!

      It certainly helps that when I bought them, I was already mentally prepared to lose the entire amount in the cause of curiosity, and that I knew this was possible. So that’s helped frame the position differently than ‘I could have made X amount by selling at Y date’.

      It’s very psychologically useful that with smaller amounts, savings habits and rates matter more than returns. I found this in 2008-09 in particular. Hope to be reading more of your journey soon!

    1. Thanks Andy. Certainly I’ve heard that suggestion. I still have some concerns and reservations about that path, which I might do a dedicated post on. They relate to manager risk, lower diversification, and in the current environment legislative uncertainty over future treatment and value of franking credits.

  2. Hi,

    I noticed that you took Vanguard Retail funds. Would like to know your thoughts on having retail funds vs ETF. Do they have better performance to compensate for higher management fees? Would going with a retail funds save on transaction fees?

    1. Hi ThinkRichMum! Thanks for reading and the comment!

      Sure, that’s worth explaining. When I started investing in Vanguard around 2001 there were only the Retail funds, and the ability to Bpay into them fortnightly was really handy (as was the single consolidated statements). Now, however, given the lower fees of the ETFs I choose to invest that way. The retail funds are just ‘bundles’ of the same underlying ETFs, so aside from the management fee and any tax realisation differences, the overall performance between the retail funds and the underlying ETFs should not differ. If I were to do it all again, with all products now available, I would probably just use the ETF VDHG, rather than the retail fund, just to save a bit on fees.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.