In Way of Harbour – An End of the Journey?

Profits on the exchange are the treasures of goblins. At one time they may be carbuncle stones, then coals, then diamonds, then flint-stones, then morning dew, then tears.

Confusion de confusions, Joseph de la Vega (1688)

Around 1500 days ago this journey began with the objective of determining if it was possible for me to achieve the goal of financial independence.

Over time the precise objectives and targets have evolved, but this post is written to mark and record the – perhaps temporary – meeting of the portfolio goal of $2.18 million this week.

Consistent with much of the journey so far – it was unpredicted and happened in an unexpected way.

A recent surge in the value of Bitcoin, together with some equity market gains, has currently pushed the overall portfolio to just above the its target level. As Aussie HiFIRE remarked, this has resulted in the achievement of a novel kind of ‘BitFIRE’. This does not exactly sit comfortably within the mainstream vision of financial independence pathways. It is certainly not the way I would have ever contemplated reaching the end objective.

Tempting the fates

As someone with a classical history background just writing this post, in fact marking this occasion in any way, appears to be an open invitation for an urgent house call from Nemesis – the balancer of life, and punisher of hubris.

A sudden downward gust, an eddy in markets, or a repetition of previous long retreats from highs would be enough to make this a temporary aberration. Another year, or more, could easily stretch out before the portfolio objective is reached again in this kind of scenario. To be clear and precise, it is my current expectation that something like that scenario will occur.

Yet it is also a stubborn fact that previous milestones, once passed, have generally stayed passed from the momentum of the journey. Part of the purpose of this record is to set out my contemporaneous thoughts and perspectives on each part of the journey as it is being made, rather than withholding to appear falsely wise after the event about the course of progress. A time capsule, rather than a finished product.

An unexpected end to the year

The crossing of the threshold came on the last day of work for the year, giving the experience some added poignancy.

As with previous moments of reaching of milestones, however, there was no magical alteration in feelings. There was no epiphany or desire to start typing out a heartfelt letter of resignation. How much of this is due to my doubts about its permanence is difficult to tell.

In contrast, the dominant sensation was of a kind of underpinning confidence and satisfaction, quiet, but definitely present in how I interacted with the tasks and people of a normal working day. In short, external events, small work or life difficulties or pressures simply assumed less weight. Or perhaps, they assumed what was their proper weight all along.

What is present is something like the sensation a ships crew might feel on seeing their home port in view – knowing that even should they be wrecked by a storm, they have at least a fair chance of waking up on familiar shores close to their homes.

Running downwind to port

The other impression is of rushing suddenness.

A few months ago, following the deep March falls, I was discussing and contemplating a need to revise the timeframe for the achievement of the current portfolio goal to well beyond the target of July 2021. Since that time both equity markets and Bitcoin have pushed consistently forward.

The significant impact of Bitcoin on the progress over the past two years can be seen in the chart below. This tracks the level of the overall portfolio with (red) and without Bitcoin (blue).

Impact of Bitcoin on portfolio

A peculiar feature of Bitcoin compared to every other asset type is that it is repriced in global exchanges every moment of every day – there is no market closing value, or pause for public holidays or weekends. So this chart will be out of date by definition the moment after it is published.

What can be seen, however, is that – at least over the past two years – Bitcoin has emerged from a minor part of the overall portfolio, to a motive force pushing it to the target goal.

Revisiting the charts?

Obvious questions arise from this event. How, if at all, does this alter my plans and the journey? Is it the end of the journey?

Casting a longer backwards glance at progress allows some perspective to inform these questions.

It can be seen from the chart below that in terms of the portfolio the journey took approximately 7 years to reach around the quarter way mark. Another three years were spent to reach close to half way, and then a much more volatile four years to reach this (potentially temporary) threshold.

Progress to Portfolio Goal

Mostly, the questions posed feel like matters for careful thought and review over the summer months. They are complicated by the rapid, unusual, unbalanced and ‘out of trim’ way the portfolio has crossed this threshold, and the strong potential for sudden reversal.

This is evident from the current asset allocation chart below.

Asset allocation out of balance

In short, time will be needed to think through issues which a few months ago seemed more distant abstractions.

Currently, I have no plans to cease work, nor to rebalance the portfolio and realise high amounts of capital gains tax. Instead, my overall perspectives on managing this unanticipated volatility remain as detailed in this August update, and my position on the role of Bitcoin and gold in the portfolio remains unchanged.

Similarly, my thinking remains that I would be uncomfortable leaving full-time work while the equity component of the portfolio remains around $180,000 less than the level implied in the target portfolio asset allocation (of at least $1.63 million).

Reaching for stones, or coal, or tears?

One question to think through carefully will be the appropriate size of any cash reserves or ‘buffer’ to potentially seek to build up. Another will be to consider if there are any large ‘one-off’ expenditures that would warrant separate dedicated funds being set aside, rather than assumed funding through the planned portfolio income of $87,000 per year.

It is perfectly possible that consideration of these will see an adjustment to the shape of plans through my regular January portfolio review. Depending on events, the most enduring effect of this recent passing of a milestone is to push forward thinking around these questions and increasing their urgency.

At the least, searching for answers to these questions should provide a focus beyond examining the inevitable moment to moment journey of the portfolio from stones and diamonds to dew, or perhaps to tears.

10 comments

  1. Congratulations on reaching your target goal!

    While I only came across your site towards the end of last year, it has been very interesting to read each of your updates and your thoughts on each asset class. I also appreciate the time you have taken to respond and answer questions, from myself and others.

    I am looking forward to reading about what your next steps are too.

  2. A massive Congratulations to you FI Explorer on reaching this point. Your dedication and unwavering financial discipline is nothing short of inspirational. And you name-dropped Nemesis…. Amazing… Are you considering a shift to part-time work now? I don’t know what industry you work in or whether part-time work is even an option for you. But that might be a way to ease yourself out of work.

    1. Thanks Jeff for the very kind comments!

      I’m glad to hear from another ancient Greek/Roman tragic like myself! If a few of the ancients had name-checked Nemesis, things would probably have worked out better for the them, right?

      Yes, longer term that’s probably part of the potential solution, need to do some thinking about how it could potentially work down the line.

      Thanks too for stopping by and reading!

  3. Hello, interested to know what you think of the portfolio of VAS (50%) VGS (40%)and VAE(10%). It will be a 2 mill portfolio but I doubt it will generate 80k in income per year on average?

    1. Hi Mfire! Thanks for the comment.

      I’m afraid I don’t typically comment on individual’s proposed portfolios and proposed ETF splits, as that will inevitably reflect their own needs, timelines, preferences and risk tolerances/capacity.

      Personally, by objective for my equity portfolio is a 50/50 split between Australian and foreign equities, so that is a similar division conceptually.

      Yes, depending on whether you are targeting a total return, or a dividend income level makes a difference here. You’re correct, at say a historical 4-4.5% income assumption from Australian shares, and a 2-3% from international equities, you would likely, based on history, have a gap to fill.

      1. Thanks for the reply. Sorry to follow this up again after so long.
        At current price level for VAS, it is not going to generate 4% dividend income. It means we need to allocate a lot more capital to live on dividends. To get 80k in dividends, the allocated capital has to be closer to 3.5mil at this current price level. ;(

        1. Yes, certainly funding FI entirely from dividends is going to lift the number. Only time will tell whether Australian equities will continue to offer the 4.0-4.5% yield that they have, on average, since around 1980. It’s possible they will decline and stay lower. Perhaps another reason to consider a focus on ‘total returns’ rather than just dividends.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.